1886 $3 (Proof)

Series: Indian Princess $3 1854-1889

PCGS PR61

PCGS PR61

View More Images

ex Trompeter collection

ex Trompeter collection

PCGS PR58

PCGS PR58

PCGS #:
8050
Designer:
James Barton Longacre
Edge:
Reeded
Diameter:
20.50 millimeters
Weight:
5.02 grams
Mintage:
142
Mint:
Philadelphia
Metal:
90% Gold, 10% Copper
Major Varieties

Current Auctions - PCGS Graded
Current Auctions - NGC Graded
For Sale Now at Collectors Corner - PCGS Graded
For Sale Now at Collectors Corner - NGC Graded

Rarity and Survival Estimates Learn More

Grades Survival
Estimate
Numismatic
Rarity
Relative Rarity
By Type
Relative Rarity
By Series
All Grades 80 R-8.2 33 / 37 TIE 33 / 37 TIE
60 or Better 75 R-8.2 34 / 37 34 / 37
65 or Better 25 R-9.0 32 / 37 TIE 32 / 37 TIE
Survival Estimate
All Grades 80
60 or Better 75
65 or Better 25
Numismatic Rarity
All Grades R-8.2
60 or Better R-8.2
65 or Better R-9.0
Relative Rarity By Type All Specs in this Type
All Grades 33 / 37 TIE
60 or Better 34 / 37
65 or Better 32 / 37 TIE
Relative Rarity By Series All Specs in this Series
All Grades 33 / 37 TIE
60 or Better 34 / 37
65 or Better 32 / 37 TIE

Condition Census What Is This?

Pos Grade Image Pedigree and History
1 PR66 PCGS grade
2 PR65 PCGS grade
2 PR65 PCGS grade
2 PR65 PCGS grade
2 PR65 PCGS grade
2 PR65 PCGS grade
2 PR65 PCGS grade
2 PR65 PCGS grade
2 PR65 PCGS grade
2 PR65 PCGS grade
#1 PR66 PCGS grade
#2 PR65 PCGS grade
#2 PR65 PCGS grade
#2 PR65 PCGS grade
#2 PR65 PCGS grade
#2 PR65 PCGS grade
#2 PR65 PCGS grade
#2 PR65 PCGS grade
#2 PR65 PCGS grade
#2 PR65 PCGS grade
David Akers (1975/88): Proofs of this date are among the most common as one would naturally expect from the fact that it has the third highest proof mintage in the series. In fact, next to the 1876, the 1886 had the most auction appearances in proof of any date in our 238 auction catalog survey, surpassing even the 1887 and 1888, which are the two dates that have higher proof mintages. Despite the auction records, however, I can say that I have seen more proofs of the 1888 than I have of any other. Proofs of the 1886 are decidedly more common than choice uncirculated specimens, and although I have seen several choice proof-like 1886's, I do not feel that it is likely that any of them would reasonably be confused with a proof.