| Survival Estimate | |
|---|---|
| All Grades | 8 |
| 60 or Better | 8 |
| 65 or Better | 4 |
| Numismatic Rarity | |
|---|---|
| All Grades | R-9.6 |
| 60 or Better | R-9.6 |
| 65 or Better | R-9.8 |
| Relative Rarity By Type All Specs in this Type | |
|---|---|
| All Grades | 1 / 2 |
| 60 or Better | 1 / 2 |
| 65 or Better | 1 / 2 |
| Relative Rarity By Series All Specs in this Series | |
|---|---|
| All Grades | 1 / 4 |
| 60 or Better | 1 / 4 |
| 65 or Better | 1 / 4 |
Although the reported mintage for this pattern is identical to that of the 1879 coiled hair stella, it appeared three less times at auction than the the 1879 coiled hair in the 238 catalogues we surveyed, and, if one examines all auctions back to the first appearance of both patterns (1882 for the 1879 coiled hair and 1906 for the 1880 coiled hair), the difference in rarity is even more obvious since the 1880 has been offered at auction only about two thirds as often as the 1879 coiled hair. This is undoubtedly due to the fact that the 1879 was restruck in small quantities, whereas the 1880 certainly was not resrtuck in the strict sense of the word (see my comments on the 1880 flowing hair), although it is possible that a small additional quantity was minted later in 1880. I really doubt that this is the case, however, and feel that the generally accepted mintage figure of ten pieces is probably correct.
However, it should be pointed out that 1880 coiled hair stellas have two distinctly different "finishes". The piece in the Smithsonian Institution and the one offered in the 1976 ANA Sale are both frosted proofs, that is, the devices are frosted while the fileds are mirrolike. However, the specimen that appeared in Paramount's Davies/Niewoehner Sale and the peice that was formerly in the Wilkison Collection are both fully brilliant proofs, so mirrorlike, in fact, that they give the appearance of having been polished, when in reality they were undoubtedly struck that way. So this pattern, even more than J-1638 and J-1657, has an aura of mystery about it. If only ten pieces were struck, it is virtually certain that they were not struck at the same time because of the two different finishes. However, there does remain the possibility that the original ten were the frosted type and the brilliant specimens are from an additional quantity that was struck later in that year, or vice-versa. Whatever the case, this stella remains the rarest of the four, and although at the time of writin my book on U.S. gold patterns I could account for only seven pieces, I can now acount for nine, split five and four between frosted proofs and brilliant ones respectively.
The 1880 Coiled Hair is the rarest of the $4 Stellas. The original mintage was probably 10 coins and in my opinion only 5 or 6 survive today.
The Four-Dollar Stella was a brief series of experimental patterns struck at the Philadelphia Mint in 1879 and 1880. Named for the prominent star on the reverse, the Stella was conceived as a vehicle for international commerce. Its composition was based on Dr. William Wheeler Hubbell’s patented "goloid" alloy—an idiosyncratic mix of 85.71% gold, 4.29% silver, and 10.00% copper—though the numismatic community almost universally categorizes it as a gold coin.
The Stella’s primary advocate was John A. Kasson, a former Congressman then serving as the U.S. Minister to the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Kasson proposed that the United States produce trade coinage adhering to the Latin Monetary Union (LMU) standard. A precursor to the modern Eurozone, the LMU required member states to adopt and adhere to unified specifications to facilitate cross-border trade.
While designed to interface with this metric-based system, the Stella did not perfectly align with inernational requirements; its stated weight and fineness resulted in a metal value of approximately $3.85, falling short of the intended parity.
Kasson’s proposal was championed by Alexander H. Stephens, former Confederate Vice President and then-Chairman of the Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures. Stephens successfully petitioned Treasury Secretary John Sherman to produce pattern coins for Congressional review. Following their distribution to lawmakers, a tawdry bit of numismatic lore suggests that more than a few of these specimens eventually changed hands in the upscale bordellos of Washington, D.C. Supporters of this theory site the number of coins that appear to have been removed from jewelry.
The Stella featured two distinct obverse designs, both dated 1879 and 1880:
Both designs featured a left-facing Liberty wearing a diadem, surrounded by the inscription * 6 * G * .3 * S * .7 * C * R * A * M * S *, denoting the coin's metallic proportions. The reverse, shared by both types, featured a five-pointed star inscribed with ONE STELLA / 400 CENTS, surrounded by the mottos E PLURIBUS UNUM and DEO EST GLORIA.
The first 40 sets were struck on a medal press in January 1880. Due to high demand among lawmakers, Congress ordered 100 additional sets in March. Ultimately, hundreds more 1879 Flowing Hair examples were struck to satisfy Congressional interest.
Though technically a pattern, the Stella’s $4 denomination and distinctive beauty have made it a cornerstone of American numismatics and it typically collected as a regular issue.
It is currently ranked 28th in the PCGS list of 100 Greatest U.S. Coins. While the 1879 Flowing Hair (#8059) is the most accessible, the 1879 Coiled Hair (#8060) and 1880-dated issues remain world-class rarities.
* * *