| Survival Estimate | |
|---|---|
| All Grades | 3,616,000 |
| 60 or Better | 90,000 |
| 65 or Better | 8,600 |
| Numismatic Rarity | |
|---|---|
| All Grades | R-1.0 |
| 60 or Better | R-2.1 |
| 65 or Better | R-3.2 |
| Relative Rarity By Type All Specs in this Type | |
|---|---|
| All Grades | 35 / 93 TIE |
| 60 or Better | 80 / 93 TIE |
| 65 or Better | 34 / 93 TIE |
| Relative Rarity By Series All Specs in this Series | |
|---|---|
| All Grades | 35 / 93 TIE |
| 60 or Better | 80 / 93 TIE |
| 65 or Better | 34 / 93 TIE |
#1 MS67 PCGS grade
|
#1 MS67 PCGS grade
|
#1 MS67 PCGS grade
|
| #1 MS67 PCGS grade |
| #1 MS67 PCGS grade |
| #1 MS67 PCGS grade |
| #1 MS67 PCGS grade |
| #1 MS67 PCGS grade |
| #1 MS67 PCGS grade |
| #1 MS67 PCGS grade |
Though the mintage of the 1962 is less than one-third that of the 1962-D, the 1962 about twice as common as the 1962-D in Gem condition. The lower mintage 1962 issue was saved while the huge mintage 1962-D was not. And the 1962-D seems to have much more trouble, as do most late D mints, with rough surfaces, i.e. marks and abraisions.